The Kingston NV2 2TB wins in 3 out of 6 comparable specs, with 1 tie. Its biggest advantage is Sequential Read (525% better).
870 EVO 2TB wins in 2 specs (DRAM Cache: 100% better).
Recommendation
Choose NV2 2TB if you want the best overall performance — especially sequential read.
Choose 870 EVO 2TB if dram cache matters more to you.
AI Versus Verdict
The Kingston NV2 2TB is the objective winner of this comparison, securing more total spec victories than the Samsung 870 EVO 2TB. The most significant advantage held by the Kingston NV2 2TB is its sequential read speed, which is 525% better than that of the alternative. This substantial lead in data transfer capability establishes it as the superior choice for users prioritizing raw throughput and high-speed file access over other architectural features.
Users who require maximum sequential read performance should select the Kingston NV2 2TB for their storage needs. Conversely, those who prioritize the reliability and performance benefits of a dedicated DRAM cache should choose the Samsung 870 EVO 2TB, as it offers a 100% advantage in that specific category. Selecting between these two drives depends entirely on whether your workflow demands the superior read speeds of the former or the integrated cache architecture of the latter.
Generated by Gemini from the objective spec comparison above. AI advice is a summary, not a benchmark — always verify critical purchases.
