The NVIDIA RTX 6000 Ada Generation wins in 9 out of 13 comparable specs, with 1 tie. Its biggest advantage is FP32 Performance (363% better).
Arc A770 wins in 3 specs (Base Clock: 130% better).
Recommendation
Choose RTX 6000 Ada Generation if you want the best overall performance — especially fp32 performance.
Choose Arc A770 if base clock matters more to you.
AI Versus Verdict
The NVIDIA RTX 6000 Ada Generation is the objective winner of this comparison, securing victory in nine out of thirteen measured categories. Its most significant technical advantage is its FP32 performance, which outperforms the Intel Arc A770 by 363 percent. While the Intel Arc A770 holds a notable lead in base clock speed, exceeding the NVIDIA RTX 6000 Ada Generation by 130 percent, the latter dominates the majority of the evaluated specifications.
Users prioritizing raw computational throughput and high-end processing power should select the NVIDIA RTX 6000 Ada Generation for its superior FP32 performance. Conversely, the Intel Arc A770 is the appropriate choice for those who specifically require the higher base clock speed provided by that hardware. Your decision should depend on whether your primary workload benefits more from the significant clock frequency advantage of the Intel card or the extensive spec-based dominance of the NVIDIA option.
Generated by Gemini from the objective spec comparison above. AI advice is a summary, not a benchmark — always verify critical purchases.
