The NVIDIA RTX 6000 Ada Generation wins in 9 out of 13 comparable specs, with 1 tie. Its biggest advantage is FP32 Performance (2068% better).
Arc A380 wins in 3 specs (Base Clock: 119% better).
Recommendation
Choose RTX 6000 Ada Generation if you want the best overall performance — especially fp32 performance.
Choose Arc A380 if base clock matters more to you.
AI Versus Verdict
The NVIDIA RTX 6000 Ada Generation is the objective winner of this comparison, securing victory in nine out of thirteen measured categories. Its most significant technical advantage is its FP32 performance, which is 2068% higher than that of the Intel Arc A380. While the Intel Arc A380 maintains a lead in base clock speed, outperforming the NVIDIA RTX 6000 Ada Generation by 119% in that specific metric, it falls behind in the majority of the evaluated hardware specifications.
Users requiring maximum computational throughput should choose the NVIDIA RTX 6000 Ada Generation, as its massive advantage in FP32 performance makes it the superior option for demanding workloads. Conversely, the Intel Arc A380 is the appropriate selection for those who prioritize a higher base clock speed for their specific computing needs. By focusing on these distinct technical strengths, buyers can align their choice with the hardware characteristics that best support their intended use cases.
Generated by Gemini from the objective spec comparison above. AI advice is a summary, not a benchmark — always verify critical purchases.
