The NVIDIA RTX 6000 Ada Generation wins in 10 out of 13 comparable specs. Its biggest advantage is FP32 Performance (2458% better).
RX 6400 wins in 3 specs (Base Clock: 110% better).
Recommendation
Choose RTX 6000 Ada Generation if you want the best overall performance — especially fp32 performance.
Choose RX 6400 if base clock matters more to you.
AI Versus Verdict
The NVIDIA RTX 6000 Ada Generation is the objective winner, securing victory in ten out of thirteen comparable fields. While the AMD RX 6400 maintains a lead in base clock speed, which is 110% higher than its competitor, the NVIDIA RTX 6000 Ada Generation offers a significantly more powerful architecture. Its most impactful advantage is its FP32 performance, which is 2458% better than that of the AMD RX 6400, establishing a massive lead in computational capability.
Users should choose the AMD RX 6400 if their primary requirement is a higher base clock speed. Conversely, the NVIDIA RTX 6000 Ada Generation is the clear choice for those who prioritize superior FP32 performance. By selecting based on these specific advantages, buyers can align their hardware choice with the technical strengths provided by each component, ensuring the selected unit meets their specific operational needs.
Generated by Gemini from the objective spec comparison above. AI advice is a summary, not a benchmark — always verify critical purchases.
