The Intel Core Ultra 7 265F is the objective winner of this comparison, securing a lead in eight of the sixteen evaluated categories. Its most significant technical advantage is an 80% larger L2 cache compared to the Intel Core Ultra 5 235F. While the latter holds its own in five categories, the superior cache capacity of the former establishes it as the more robust option for handling complex data operations and demanding computational tasks.

Users prioritizing maximum cache capacity for intensive workloads should select the Intel Core Ultra 7 265F to leverage its substantial architectural advantage. Conversely, the Intel Core Ultra 5 235F is the better choice for budget-conscious builders, as it offers a 47% better MSRP. Choosing between these two processors depends on whether your primary requirement is the increased cache performance of the higher-tier model or the significant cost efficiency provided by the entry-tier option.