The Intel Core Ultra 9 285 is the objective winner of this comparison, securing victory in eleven out of sixteen measured specifications. Its most significant advantage is its L2 cache, which is 567% larger than that of the competing processor. While the AMD Ryzen 5 8600G holds its own in four categories, the Intel Core Ultra 9 285 dominates the majority of the technical fields, establishing itself as the superior option based on the provided data.

Users prioritizing raw cache capacity for intensive computing tasks should choose the Intel Core Ultra 9 285 for its substantial architectural lead. Conversely, the AMD Ryzen 5 8600G is the appropriate selection for those who specifically require the efficiency benefits of its Max Turbo Power, which is 74% better than the Intel alternative. Your final decision should depend on whether your workload demands the massive cache advantage of the Intel chip or the power efficiency profile of the AMD processor.