The Intel Core Ultra 5 235F is the objective winner of this comparison, securing victory in ten out of fourteen measured specifications. Its most significant technical advantage over the AMD Ryzen 5 2600 is its L2 cache capacity, which is 567% larger. While the AMD Ryzen 5 2600 maintains a 43% advantage in Max Turbo Power, the Intel Core Ultra 5 235F dominates the majority of the evaluated categories, establishing itself as the superior component based on the provided data.

Users should choose the Intel Core Ultra 5 235F if they prioritize the substantial L2 cache capacity for their computing tasks. Conversely, the AMD Ryzen 5 2600 remains a viable alternative for those who specifically require the higher Max Turbo Power provided by that processor. Selecting between these two components depends entirely on whether your specific workload benefits more from the expanded cache architecture of the Intel option or the power profile of the AMD alternative.